Lydia Cornell

Monday, September 03, 2007

On Labor Day Bush Runs Away

DENNIS KUCINICH will be our guest on BASHAM AND CORNELL PROGRESSIVE TALK on September 17!

Keith Olbermann gave another of his riveting "Special Comments" on the unconscious person in the White House. George Bush has shamed our nation. He has written a book revising history for his "legacy." Instead of helping the families of the troops who died for his disastrous war, he is bragging about pocketing speaking fees of $50,000 after he leaves office. He is the cause of their deaths, yet he goes to Iraq on our labor day for a photo op. There is a brilliant post at my friend Alicia's blog called "Suicidal Insanity." Last Left B4 Hooterville

As hard as it is to love our enemies, I believe we must pray deeply for George Bush. We must pray to see him guided by the right ideas and principles, instead of fear. Every thing he has done, has been fear-based and disastrous. It's as if he has no moral compass, no conscience and no feelings for others or what they go through. He is playing with toy soldiers.

But there is a spiritual power that is much bigger than Bush or any of us, believe me I know firsthand. When we actually put into practice true prayer (which has nothing to do with the anthropomorphic fear and punishment fundamentalist god of the religious right) THINGS ACTUALLY CHANGE.

This is a universe of laws of harmony. We ourselves must stop our defeatism. Refuse to allow any thought of Bush starting war with Iran into your consciousness. We ourselves cannot be fearful. Bush cannot have that much power. We will not allow him to start war with Iran. I for one, am seeing him as waking up. If he has even a glimmer of the true "Christ" within, he will know he has been ruled by fear. Love casts out fear.

We have to stop saying "Bush is going to attack Iran" as if it's a done deal. We can say, "We will not tolerate this any longer" but let's get active. We need to get out on the streets.

We need to hold our thoughts higher about the man. It is metaphysics and I guarantee it works. As hard as it is to change our vision of him, we have to. Our vision of him will create a different outcome.

ON THIS LABOR DAY ...



On this Labor Day in the United States, a national holiday established more than a century ago to honor the American worker, Americans typically spend the day away from work, enjoying picnics in the park or spending the last holiday of the summer outdoors.

We must not forget that U.S. workers had to literally fight for their rights to a decent wage and improved working conditions and many risked their lives trying to organize.

In 1894, some 34 railway union members were killed when President Grover Cleveland ordered federal troops to break up a railroad strike outside Chicago, Illinois. Cleveland, who was up for re-election that year, needed to appease angry workers nationwide, so he signed into law a national holiday called Labor Day in honor of the worker.

Violence against U.S. workers continued in the 20th century. In 1902, 14 coal miners
were killed by a mine company's private police force. In 1911, about 150 people, mostly women and children, died in a fire working in a New York City sweatshop, Massachusetts police beat women and children in a textile strike.

Americans labor in many different ways. On this Labor Day, the number of people without health insurance continues to rise, up to 15.8% last year. 47 million Americans lacked health insurance in 2006, an increase of 8 million since Bush took office.

Median annual earnings for full-time, year-round workers dropped from last year, the third year in a row. Household income is down $956 since 2000. It rose slightly last year because more household members are working, and for longer hours. But they are getting paid less for their work.

Wages and salaries now make up the lowest share of the nation’s gross domestic product since the government began recording the data in 1947, while corporate profits have climbed to their highest share since the 1960’s.

The trend to re-classify full-time workers as “independent contractors” continues to rise. Although the same work is done by the same people, contracting it out allows employers to avoid the minimum wage increase and terminate benefits that accrue only to “employees.” Reclassification also lets them avoid payroll taxes, a dodge that creates an invisible subsidy to corporate America in the range of $3 billion.

Since 2000, premiums for employer-sponsored health insurance for families have skyrocketed. The average monthly worker contribution for family coverage in 2000 was $135. It has increased to $298 or by 84%.

In the first quarter of the year, wages and salaries represented 41 percent of gross domestic product, down from almost 50 percent in the first quarter of 2001 and a record 53.6 percent in the first quarter of 1970, according to the Commerce Department.

The corporate policies of George W Bush has allowed more manufacturing companies to move overseas in the last six years, giving the country a trade deficit of more than $700 billion annually. And the jobs lost in manufacturing have been disproportionately union jobs.

While the unionization rate in manufacturing was more than 40 percent in the sixties, in 2006 it was just 11.6 percent, less than the 12 percent average for all workers, although still somewhat higher than the 7.4 percent average for the private sector as a whole.

Government policies have also supported anti-union practices in other ways. A main purpose of trade agreements like NAFTA was to make it as easy as possible to relocate factories overseas.

A 30 percent over-valued dollar effectively imposes a 30 percent tariff on goods exported from the United States, while providing a subsidy of 30 percent on goods imported into the United States.

We have a growing crisis in America today, and it is our own countries purposeful neglect of the homeless, the hungry, and the working poor. It was recently reported that there are nearly one million people that are homeless in the United States today.

Even worse, over 40% of the homeless are families. Reuters reported that more Americans went homeless and hungry in 2006 than the year before and that children made up almost one quarter of those in emergency shelters.

Nearly one million families lost their homes last year. This year, it will likely be 2 million. There were 25,000 layoffs in the mortgage industry in the first three weeks of August. Building supply and furniture manufacturers have been cutting back. With home construction 25 percent below last year and falling, hundreds of thousands of building trades workers could lose their jobs.

As economic conditions worsen, right-wing corporate interests are always ready to sow division and fear. It’s the immigrants’ fault. Consumers aren’t spending enough. Consumers aren’t saving enough. It’s the government’s fault for wasting your tax dollars on health care for kids.

In the Great Depression of the 1930s, the American people rejected those arguments. They rejected racism, and under the slogan “Black and white, unite and fight," They organized unions that raised wages and improved working conditions.

On this another Labor Day, Americans have labored with the fact that their sons and daughters, neighbors and friends are strapped in an endless war for profit, with no end in sight.

The U.S economy is quickly falling into a severe recession, that could very well end up in a Modern Day Depression if something isn't done. Millions of Americans lose their jobs each month, millions more are underemployed.

There is much laboring going on in America, on this Labor Day. The homeless labor for a better way, our nation labors over those stuck in a needless war, each American labors over the future of the economy and those in the workplace labor with fear over the future of their employment.

That is America, On This Labor Day!


We live in the richest country in the world. There's plenty to spare and for no man, woman, or child to be in want. And in addition to this our country was founded on what should have been a great , true principle -- the freedom, equality, and rights of each individual. Huh! And what has come of this start? There are corporations worth billions of dollars--and hundreds of thousands of people who don't get to eat.

Carson McCullers

Labels: ,

295 Comments:

  • High-quality health care for all Americans moved closer to reality this Labor Day with the 13-million-member AFL-CIO unveiling a major drive to achieve universal health care by 2009.

    “The out-of-control cost of health care is crippling American families and American businesses,” AFL-CIO President John Sweeney told reporters at the federation’s annual briefing Aug. 29. “Labor’s campaign is based on the simple premise that no one in America should go without health care, and we’re going to make sure candidates and elected leaders understand that the people will accept nothing less.”

    The AFL-CIO launched a drive that it says will result, by 2009, in all Americans being able to benefit from a health insurance system that:

    • controls rising and irrational costs,

    • provides comprehensive, high-quality health care to all,

    • gives every family the opportunity for preventive care,

    • preserves the ability to choose doctors,

    • has government controlling costs, guaranteeing fairness and efficiency, and eliminating private insurer greed and incompetence,

    • lowers employer costs,

    • builds on positive elements of programs like Medicare and draws upon experiences that work in other countries.

    Some AFL-CIO unions back HR 676, the bill introduced by Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) that would institute single-payer, national health care for all and eliminate the private insurance companies altogether. Asked if he supports HR 676, Sweeney said, “The Conyers bill is in line with our vision for secure, high-quality health care for all Americans.” He added, “Rather than wedding ourselves to one bill at this time, we are building grassroots support for health care reform and plan to work with a worker-friendly president and Congress to enact meaningful reform after the 2008 elections.”

    This is something all Americans would benefit from.

    By Blogger Larry, at 5:47 AM  

  • The main reason for the upsurge in uninsured Americans is that employment-based coverage continued to deteriorate. Indeed, the number of full-time workers without health insurance rose from 20.8 million in 2005 to 22.0 million in 2006, presumably because either the employers or the workers or both found it too costly.

    Sadly, the one area where the nation had made progress — reducing the number of uninsured children — took a turn for the worse…. last year the number of uninsured children jumped more than 600,000 to reach 8.6 million. The main reason, advocacy groups say, is that access and funding for the low-income programs became tighter while employer coverage for dependents eroded.

    Eliminating insurance for dependents is the corporate way in Bush's America.

    By Blogger Larry, at 5:49 AM  

  • The United Steelworkers (USW) today endorsed Senator John Edwards as the Democratic nominee for President.

    The USW, the nation’s largest private sector union, was joined in making its endorsement by the United Mineworkers of America (UMWA), giving Edwards the largest bloc of union support so far among the field of eight presidential candidates.

    In making the announcement, USW President Leo W. Gerard said, “All of the Democratic candidates in the field share our values, and any one of them would be a major improvement over the current administration.

    “But none of them is a more forceful advocate for those values than John Edwards. Senator Edwards is committed, as he has been throughout his life, to going to bat for everyday Americans and to changing a broken political system that leaves millions of Americans without a voice in their government.”

    The Steelworkers also noted that numerous polls show Edwards to be the most electable Democrat in the general election. The USW said it aims to play a leadership role in ensuring Edwards’ nomination, adding that the union's significant membership in the early caucus and primary states and high levels of membership density in crucial battleground states in a general election give it a unique opportunity to contribute to Edwards' nomination and election.

    Edwards is the one Republicans fear most.

    By Blogger Larry, at 5:52 AM  

  • Well, after nearly a year in office, on this Labor Day, at least Speaker Botox can point to one accomplishment: the first rise in the minimum wage in a decade.

    Although with energy costs the highest they've been and food and housing prices at historic levels, most, if not all of the increase, is already gobbled up.

    Add to this, more Americans than ever have no health insurance and must rely on overburdened ER's for primary care. But the elites in the White House and the Congress have health care.

    I wonder if Miss Nancy's Botox injections are considered a work-related, covered item?

    By Blogger Christopher, at 5:54 AM  

  • Christopher:

    The only reason Pelosi passed minimum wage was to cover the attacks on Congress giving themselves another raise.

    By Blogger Larry, at 5:58 AM  

  • Top private-equity and hedge fund managers made more in 10 minutes than average-paid U.S. workers earned all of last year, according to a new study from two research groups.

    The 20 highest-paid fund managers made an average of $657.5 million, or 22,255 times the U.S. average annual salary of $29,500, said the study, released today by Institute for Policy Studies and United for a Fair Economy. The study cited data from the U.S. Labor Department and Forbes magazine.

    ``The fact that these pay levels for fund managers are so out-of-sight is going to drive up pay at publicly traded companies,'' said Sarah Anderson, director of the global economy program at the Washington-based Institute for Policy Studies and a co-author of the study. ``There are people out there with a straight face claiming that public company executives are underpaid.''

    The private equity boom in the past year has pushed the pay ceiling for fund managers ``further into the economic stratosphere,'' the study said.

    Chief executive officers at large U.S. corporations averaged $10.8 million in pay last year, the study said, citing an Associated Press survey. Their weekly pay of $207,700 was about seven times the average worker's annual salary.

    This is Bush's America.

    By Blogger Larry, at 5:58 AM  

  • Bush is in Iraq for his annual photo op, and daily boast of how safe it is, as thousands guard his entourage, and dozens of U.S fighter pilots fly overhead.

    How safe is that?

    By Blogger Larry, at 6:03 AM  

  • The median price of a single family house soared by about 86 percent from 1997 to 2005, according to statistics from the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight. Housing prices hit their peak in 2005, when they jumped almost 13 percent for the year.

    "Home prices went up far faster than any wage growth," said Lipman, "especially among low income families, whose real wages have either risen anemically or actually fallen."

    As usual it is the poor who will suffer the most as the rich get an ever bigger slice of the pie and the rest are left to fight over the scraps.

    By Blogger Larry, at 6:22 AM  

  • Larry, Lydia

    I am alarmed by the drums of war with Iran being beaten, thanks to LIES spread around by distorted analysis of some so called journalists.

    I have posted the text of the recent (Aug 27 2007)resolution bw IAEA and Iran. can you please raise a little flag about how American president is distorting/ignoring those facts and confabulates baseless threats!!?

    Praying for peace ... with a breaking heart ...

    By Blogger Naj, at 6:25 AM  

  • Naj:

    I agree with you Bush is about to launch a needless war with Iran and I will be happy to help you spread the message.

    Everytime Bush wants war he does so with lies and distortions, which is what he is doing with Iran.

    By Blogger Larry, at 6:29 AM  

  • Richard Draper has a book about GW Bush coming out Tuesday, called Dead Certain. President George H.W. Bush in 1982 was an honorary pallbearer at the funeral of Draper’s grandfather, Leon Jaworski, a special prosecutor in the Watergate scandal. Family ties. In the book, George says:

    He cries alot. (I’d cry alot too if I had as much blood on my hands as he does.)

    After leaving office, he wants to start a “Freedom Institute” where he’ll promote Democracy around the world. (We’ve seen his kind of democracy)

    He’ll do some speeches, also….to replenish the ol’ coffers. (because you can never have too much money)

    His top commander in Iraq, Gen. David H. Petraeus, would perhaps do a better job selling progress to the American people than he could. (Hence he’ll put his name on the report we’re about to hear this month)

    He acknowledged one major failing of the early occupation of Iraq when he said of disbanding the Saddam Hussein-era military, “The policy was to keep the army intact; didn’t happen.” ( ONE major failing? Oh paaaalease)

    When Mr. Draper pointed out that Mr. Bush’s former Iraq administrator, L. Paul Bremer III, had gone ahead and forced the army’s dissolution and then asked Mr. Bush how he reacted to that, Mr. Bush said, “Yeah, I can’t remember, I’m sure I said, ‘This is the policy, what happened?’ ” But, he added, “Again, Hadley’s got notes on all of this stuff,” referring to Stephen J. Hadley, his national security adviser. (The administration of I Don’t Recall, and why would he…..I mean this is not important, right?)

    What a book: Bush Cries and Lies!

    By Blogger Larry, at 6:33 AM  

  • Bush is allegedly in Iraq.

    Remember the prancing, plastic turkey photo-op a few years back?

    No U.S. soldier said he or she recalled seeing or hearing Bush had visited Iraq.

    Not a one.

    A far more likely scenario then (and possibily today?) is Bush was flown to Qatar or even Saudi Arabia and the photo-op was managed to appear to look like An Bar province in Iraq.

    In 2007, it's all theater. How many times have movies been shot with Toronto standing in for Manhattan or London. Vancover for San Francisco or Los Angeles? I have friends in the industry and they tell me this is done all the time.

    Just saying.............

    By Blogger Christopher, at 6:37 AM  

  • Christopher:

    Check out Naj's post and the info on Bush's lies to war with Iran.

    Neoresistance

    By Blogger Larry, at 6:44 AM  

  • "But there was bad news on this front [the poverty front] as well,” said NBC “Nightly News” anchor Brian Williams August 28. “The number of Americans without health insurance has gone up from nearly 45 million in 2005 to 47 million Americans last year.

    Williams was wrong. According to the U.S. Census Report, “Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2006,” a little more than 10 million of those uninsured are not citizens of the United States or roughly 22 percent of the total.

    CBS “Evening News” took it one step further. The network went to Arlington County, Va., to what is “listed in the census report as one of the richest counties in country.” But the report didn’t mention it also has a relatively high percentage of immigrants, nearly 28 percent, that make up the county’s population.

    What CBS and NBC did not report is that the number of uninsured in household incomes of less than $25,000 annually actually decreased – from 14.5 million in 2005 to a little less than 14 million in 2006. So, more of the poorest in the United States are actually getting health insurance coverage.

    What else did they leave out?

    Those who live in households with income above $50,000 annually (households above the national median income of $48,201) make up almost 18 million of the uninsured. That means 38 percent of the uninsured in this new report could most likely afford coverage, but chose not to have it. That 18 million of the uninsured constitutes most of the 2.1-million person increase in the uninsured from 2005 to 2006.

    By Blogger Voltron, at 7:13 AM  

  • I believe the word "countries" in the 15th paragraph should read "country's".

    Additionally, if the writer is actually suggesting that it was organized labor which raised wages during the depression and not the arms buildup to WWII, then I don't know what they're smoking.

    By Blogger Sauros, at 7:14 AM  

  • TIPTON, Iowa - Democratic presidential hopeful John Edwards said on Sunday that his universal health care proposal would require that Americans go to the doctor for preventive care.

    "It requires that everybody be covered. It requires that everybody get preventive care," he told a crowd sitting in lawn chairs in front of the Cedar County Courthouse. "If you are going to be in the system, you can't choose not to go to the doctor for 20 years. You have to go in and be checked and make sure that you are OK."

    He noted, for example, that women would be required to have regular mammograms in an effort to find and treat "the first trace of problem." Edwards and his wife, Elizabeth, announced earlier this year that her breast cancer had returned and spread.

    Edwards said his mandatory health care plan would cover preventive, chronic and long-term health care. The plan would include mental health care as well as dental and vision coverage for all Americans.

    "The whole idea is a continuum of care, basically from birth to death," he said.



    Can't you just see the lines of people being brought to hospitals in handcuffs by the "health police"?
    Gun point health care. Dems sure do care about democracy...

    By Blogger Voltron, at 7:24 AM  

  • Great post. We've lost a lot of what was gained by the labor movement in the early part of the 20th century. And the continued horrors of the mining industry are a showcase for this fact.

    The unions had their pros and cons. When they became too strong they became corrupt. And they negotiated perks that the rest of us don't even have, which are now crippling the American auto industry. However, the earlier unions made very important contributions: elimination of child labor, safer working conditions, ability to negotiate with management, etc. For everything there must be a happy medium, and it seems the scales have tipped strongly to management's side again. It's time to change the paradigm once more.

    I disagree with Edwards' idea that people should HAVE to go for preventive health care. This is a free country and one's health is one's own business. But if we at least offer all citizens the opportunity for preventive health care, it would be a big step in the right direction.

    By Blogger Mauigirl, at 8:10 AM  

  • Voltron, I can see the headlines now: "Health Resisters Rounded Up In Police Raids, Charged With Mental Disorders". I like Edwards' idea. It's about time the US adopt an inescapable mental hygiene regime. At least 25% of the populace must be drugged. Bush has the right idea with the New Freedom Initiative, but Edwards' plan is more salable, and he delivers the pitch quite well. The new Michael Moore movie is wonderful programming for it.

    By Blogger Sauros, at 8:57 AM  

  • That means 38 percent of the uninsured in this new report could most likely afford coverage, but chose not to have it.

    Nobody chooses not to have health insurance.

    However, when a primary wage earner gets laid-off and his salary was in the 50K range, COBRA benefits for a family of 4 (husband, wife and 2 kids) can range from $800 a month to $1,400 a month.

    Numbers like this make continuing health coverage a choice between shelter, food and utilities or, COBRA.

    By Blogger Christopher, at 9:11 AM  

  • I propose a new anthem for the Labor Movement: Funeral March of A Marionette.

    By Blogger Sauros, at 9:15 AM  

  • "The unions had their pros and cons. When they became too strong they became corrupt. And they negotiated perks that the rest of us don't even have, which are now crippling the American auto industry."

    Maui, Larry isn't going to like that. He's been spending a whole lot of time saying it's Bush's fault...

    By Blogger Voltron, at 10:00 AM  

  • "Nobody chooses not to have health insurance."

    BULL!

    From when I first entered the work force at 16 most (if not all) the jobs I had offered health insurance with a small co-pay. I was young and healthy and I didn't see the advantage to paying $50 to $75 a month for something I didn't think I'd need.

    It wasn't until I was in my late 30's or early 40's that I started taking advantage of my employers health care plans. About the same time I realized I wasn't indestructible.

    How many of those "uninsured" do you think are younger workers like I was?

    By Blogger Voltron, at 10:08 AM  

  • Also, let's not forget that in most families today the wife often works as well and has access to health insurance through her job as well.

    (and if any of those "kids" are over 16 they probably have access through their employers as well)

    By Blogger Voltron, at 10:11 AM  

  • Sauros,

    I'm not biting. I don't agree with any of your points or globalism for that matter.

    By Blogger Voltron, at 10:13 AM  

  • Thats a very interesting article, full of great information Larry.........I never knew how Labor Day originated.

    Our new President should make it a holiday after Bush and his Neo Con thugs are out of power.........we can call it National Mental Health Day!

    By Blogger Mike, at 10:31 AM  

  • Your absolutely right Larry, we need universal health coverage!

    By Blogger Mike, at 10:32 AM  

  • As you saw from my video, the peace-mongers in Fort Wayne believe Health Care should be at the top of any agenda (after stopping this illegal and immoral war).

    By Blogger Robert Rouse, at 10:43 AM  

  • Voltron said...
    "Nobody chooses not to have health insurance."

    BULL!

    From when I first entered the work force at 16 most (if not all) the jobs I had offered health insurance with a small co-pay. I was young and healthy and I didn't see the advantage to paying $50 to $75 a month for something I didn't think I'd need.

    It wasn't until I was in my late 30's or early 40's that I started taking advantage of my employers health care plans. About the same time I realized I wasn't indestructible.

    How many of those "uninsured" do you think are younger workers like I was?"


    Your Not addressing several key points Volt

    1) Health care NEEDS to be affordable for people if not provided universally........Its NOT even for people who DO have health insurance I was in an accident last year, spent one day at the hospital and about a month of Physical therapy and was getting bills for $30,000-$40,000 that I couldnt pay....................No one ever went bankrupt or was ruined financially from universal health care.

    2) People need to tale financial responsibility for their health care and that needs to be affordable and the way I see it Universal health care is the only way that will happen.......WHAT happens if some kid doesnt THINK he needs health care because HE thinks he is industuctable and gets in a bad accident or becomes severely ill who gets stuck paying his hundreds of thousans of dollars in medical bills and who gets hurt the most by this.........the working class is who, its no hardship for the rich to pay medical bills when needed, the poor cant afford it so what happens they jack up the costs so the working class who DO take personal responsibility have to pay more and more and thats why we have had declining and stagnating wages.......the camels back has to break sooner or later health care costs are increasing exp[onentially the system is a total pathetic failure.

    People most likely choose NOT to have health care because it is NOT affordable.

    By Blogger Mike, at 10:44 AM  

  • You hear GWB CLAIM our presence in Iraq is denying the Al Qaeda terrorists that attascked us a safe haven to plan more attacks............Did the slimy liar forget Osama, did he forget about Afghanistan and Pakistan where Al Qaeda is winning because he neglected those areas to invade a country that had NOTHING to do with attacking us,,,,,,,,,,,,,,its pathetic when we have a President as delusional as an idiot named Sauros!

    By Blogger Mike, at 10:58 AM  

  • MSNBC spoke on Monday with Rep. Jason Altmire (D-PA), who recently returned from a trip to Iraq.

    "Our troops are amazing. They have done what has been asked of them," Altmire began. "But the flip side of that, unfortunately, the Iraqi government is in complete disarray. And the purpose of the surge was to allow the Iraqi government ... the opportunity to move forward. I think we're worse off ... today than we were six or eight months ago."

    "I support a timeline as a strategy for success," Altmire said, emphasizing that the president had vetoed Congress's attempt to establish a timeline for US redeployment out of Iraq." It's the only leverage we have for the Iraqi government to know that we're serious."

    "There's no sense of urgency there," Altmire concluded. "They think we're going to be there forever to hold their hand while they posture and play political games and bicker with each other. ... They have to step up and run their own government."

    The result of the Bush "surge."

    By Blogger Larry, at 11:04 AM  

  • WASHINGTON - The Bush administration issued proposed rules Friday to trim Medicaid payments to schools.

    Medicaid is the federal-state health insurance program for poor people.

    Schools are currently billing Medicaid for administrative and overhead costs that aren't related to delivering health services to poor people, said Dennis Smith, director for the Center for Medicaid and State Operations.

    He said examples have included costs associated with school construction projects and transporting poor students to school.

    George W Bush: Taking from poor children and giving to Halliburton!

    By Blogger Larry, at 11:07 AM  

  • GENEVA -- American workers stay longer in the office, at the factory or on the farm than their counterparts in Europe and most other rich nations, and they produce more per person over the year.

    They also get more done per hour than everyone but the Norwegians, according to a U.N. report released Monday, which said the United States "leads the world in labor productivity."

    The average U.S. worker produces $63,885 of wealth per year, more than their counterparts in all other countries, the International Labor Organization said in its report. Ireland comes in second at $55,986, followed by Luxembourg at $55,641, Belgium at $55,235 and France at $54,609.

    The productivity figure is found by dividing the country's gross domestic product by the number of people employed. The U.N. report is based on 2006 figures for many countries, or the most recent available.

    Only part of the U.S. productivity growth, which has outpaced that of many other developed economies, can be explained by the longer hours Americans are putting in, the ILO said.

    The U.S., according to the report, also beats all 27 nations in the European Union, Japan and Switzerland in the amount of wealth created per hour of work - a second key measure of productivity.

    Americans working longer and harder for less money: That's the Bush Economy!

    By Blogger Larry, at 11:10 AM  

  • The Census Bureau says there are 47 million people in the U.S. without health insurance; more than 5 million of them, according to a study recently released by the Urban Institute, are children. Many wind up in expensive emergency rooms, often because the federal programs aimed at helping those who fall through the health-care cracks are not well understood and not well used. Dr. Robert Simon, interim chief of Chicago's Cook County Bureau of Health Services, discusses the issue with Scott Simon.

    This is the result of George W Bush: "Compassionate Conservative."

    By Blogger Larry, at 11:19 AM  

  • Check out the latest post by Chuck who is a regular commenter here:

    Bushmerika 2

    Another classic rant!

    By Blogger Larry, at 11:31 AM  

  • Baghdad - Two civilians were killed in a car bomb attack in central Baghdad on Monday, while 11 civilians were kidnapped by extremists in north of the Iraqi capital, news reports said.

    The car bomb was set of on a main road in the city's Alwiya quarter, the Aswat al-Iraq news agency said. Three people were injured in the attack.

    The press agency, also reporting on the kidnapping, said about 15 men set up an illegal roadblock on the road linking Baghdad with the Diyala province to the north-east. The victims were ordered out of their vehicle while travelling along the road.

    And that "surge" is working so well!

    By Blogger Larry, at 12:00 PM  

  • Larry, you are the best! thanks.
    Naj

    By Blogger Naj, at 12:10 PM  

  • Larry said...

    Bush is in Iraq for his annual photo op, and daily boast of how safe it is, as thousands guard his entourage, and dozens of U.S fighter pilots fly overhead.

    How safe is that?

    6:03 AM
    ----------------
    Larry:

    He took his girlfriend, Condi, with him. I wonder where The Robot (Laura)is spending this holiday?

    Great post! ;)

    By Blogger Suzie-Q (S-Q), at 12:29 PM  

  • This post has been removed by the author.

    By Blogger Suzie-Q (S-Q), at 12:30 PM  

  • Health care has gotten so expensive for employers that they can no longer offer it to their employees! :(

    By Blogger Suzie-Q (S-Q), at 12:31 PM  

  • How many of those "uninsured" do you think are younger workers like I was?

    Who knows? Who cares?

    The fact remains, there are more than 47 million Americans without health insurance and the the number is getting bigger, not smaller.

    What braindead rightwingers can't wrap their tiny peabrains around is this: many of the uninsured use the ER's at their local county or city hospital for primary care and the cost is past along to home owners in the form of property taxes.

    Want to lower your property taxes? Then demand universal healthcare for all Americans, just as the rest of the industrialized nations provide their citizens.

    By Blogger Christopher, at 12:35 PM  

  • Thanks Suzie:

    I didn't know Condi went with him, but they do alot of late night wallowing.

    Perhaps Pickles is stuck in the latest lounge in Crawford, experiencing rural drinks.

    By Blogger Larry, at 12:41 PM  

  • Check out Naj's post on evidence against Bush's lies to war with Iran.

    Neoresistance

    By Blogger Larry, at 12:42 PM  

  • Larry, what an excellent article. You hit it dead-on. As a side note, the September holiday was chosen to avoid support for the day that unions in other countries had chosen for labor day. May Day.

    By Blogger TomCat, at 12:52 PM  

  • Thanks for the compliment and info on Labor Day Tomcat.

    By Blogger Larry, at 12:58 PM  

  • A constitutional lawyer who served in Ronald Reagan's administration says President Bush's "apparently criminal" authorization of a warrantless wiretapping program is grounds for the House to begin an impeachment inquiry.

    By not beginning such an investigation, impeachment will become a "virtual dead letter," Bruce Fein, former deputy attorney general under Regan, said in a essay published in Slate.

    Fein has emerged as a fierce critic of Bush's administration and has previously called for the president and Vice President Dick Cheney to be impeached.

    "The House does not require, nor should it await, proof beyond a reasonable doubt of misconduct," Fein wrote in the essay published Friday. "To wait for such proof subverts the whole purpose of an impeachment inquiry."

    Ample grounds for an impeachment inquiry lie in the president's shady justifications for his "Terrorist Surveillance Program," which Fein says subverted the check's on law enforcement powers inherent in the Constitution and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

    Remove Pelosi and Reid and Impeachment will Begin.

    By Blogger Larry, at 1:16 PM  

  • Christopher - you're right. Bush is probably doing a mock photo from a nearby country, or maybe even Texas.

    By Blogger Lydia Cornell, at 2:54 PM  

  • Health Care is my biggest issue and while I have for the most part gone back to being a lurker I just need to open up again, if just for a moment.

    13 years ago next month, my wife and I were expecting our first child. Her job did not have insurance benefits and while my job did offer them, I was not eligible for another month. No problem, the baby wasn't due until early February and I was already assured that the birth would be covered. Life was good.

    On a Friday, my sister-in-law checked my wife's blood pressure as practice for her nursing exam. The blood pressure was extremely high and a doctor was notified. We were told to bring her in to see him immediately. Later that afternoon, Kelly was admitted into the hospital.

    We knew she would probably be put on bedrest for the rest of the pregnancy so Saturday morning, I called her boss and quit on Kelly's behalf. Ten minutes later I was called into my boss's office and fired -- they said they just didnt see potential in me.

    No job, no insurance, no money, no income, a wife in the hospital -- I was scared out of my mind. I didnt dare check Kelly out of the hospital, I was afraid I would lose both her and the baby but I knew the bills were going to be racking up. Finally, a social worker sat me down and said "Stop worrying about the money. You need to focus on your wife and your child ... let the money sort itself out."

    On Monday my son was born - 2 lbs 7 oz. Four months, two operations, and hundreds of thousands of dollars later I got to take him home. Thank God for Medicaid.

    If that scenario played out today, I wouldnt qualify.

    Voltron, it's all very well and fine for you supposed pro-lifers to say "but why should I have to pay for it" and "hundreds of thousands of dollars of my money" and make your bogus claims about people choosing not to be insured. The fact of the matter is if it wasnt for Medicaid being there when I needed it, I would be childless and a widower.

    Good quality Health Care SHOULD be a guaranteed right in this country and anybody claiming to be a Christian or pro-life ought to be among the first to be fighting for it.

    By Blogger MCH, at 3:00 PM  

  • Oh, and by the way Voltron, since your tax money did help pay for my son's birth and hospital stay, I would be more than happy to pay you back your share.

    Let's see, around 200 million taxpayers ... a few hundred thousand dollars ... round it up to 5 hundred thousand to cover his 3rd and 4th surgery ...

    Just let me know where to send the penny and you can keep the change.

    By Blogger MCH, at 3:05 PM  

  • Christopher - you're right. Bush is probably doing a mock photo from a nearby country, or maybe even Texas.

    Lydia,

    Remember the so-called "spider hole" the troops yanked Saddam Hussein out of? That magical event took place in December.

    The pictures showed the brave, U.S. troops hauling an aged, dirty and dishoveled Saddam from his hiding place. Alas, Bush was a hero!

    But there was another image that made citizens of the Middle East laugh at Americans.

    The date palms. The date palms were covered with brown and golden, perfectly ripe dates, ready to be harvested, sold and enjoyed. You see, dates become ripe in Iraq (and throughout the Middle East) in late-August to late-September. By December, there are no dates on the palm trees.

    This revelation would suggest Saddam was captured by U.S. troops at least 3 months, and possibly 4 months earlier. But of course, 4 months earlier, Bush's approval numbers were above 50 points. By December, his job approval numbers had dipped below 40 points for the first time.

    Rove, Inc. needed an event to help raise Bush's standing with the American people but, nature, or at least, agriculture, revealed the truth about the lie.

    By Blogger Christopher, at 3:10 PM  

  • I saw Condi standing to Bush's left with a look of..."what the hell am I doing here...and what is he talking about?" She looked like she wanted to be miles aways from wherever it was. She has kept a low profile now for some time...I personally think she is regretting the turn her life has taken...because it is going down in flames with these people she aligned herself with. She's a smart woman...she should have seen the bigger picture and stepped away...but she looked through rose colored love glasses. Idiot!

    By Blogger sumo, at 3:19 PM  

  • Sumo:

    She must have some foggy rose colored glasses to follow that dunce around the world.

    By Blogger Larry, at 3:22 PM  

  • Conda-lies-alot, was probably thinking, "There is a stain on my legacy, and it's name is Bush."

    By Blogger clif, at 3:48 PM  

  • Howdy Larry

    I celebrated Labor Day by working on my side job. "Luckily" I don't earn enough that way to need to even claim the income on my Taxes. Lucky, sans the fear-quotes, that I have a skill which may just save my arse from anything as drastic as the homelessness I once did indeed face, should the more dire of consequences of Bu$hCo's ideology befall our nation.

    Hmmm... Could, but won't, go into anything lengthy here. Just wanted to tell you "Thanks!" for keeping the factual side of our "Great Nation" on the table. You are a patriot, in my considered opinion. Whether or not you and I might agree on all the details of this country's ailments and strengths, I know that you speak to reality and with unassailable facts about our successive Governments' goals and priorities.

    False premises kill, and the Reaganesque belief in unbridled, under-regulated Capitalism (essentially, Bu$hCo's so-called "ownership society") has long been a convicted murderer in the court of Socio-Economic reality.

    Thanks again.

    By Blogger MichaelBains, at 4:43 PM  

  • Thank you Michael Bains for the kind words and for your comments here at Lydia's blog.

    Reagan started the drive to destroy unions, and the Bush family has taken that beginning to all new levels.

    By Blogger Larry, at 6:07 PM  

  • The Chinese military hacked into a Pentagon computer network in June in the most successful cyber attack on the US defence department, say American ­officials.

    The Pentagon acknowledged shutting down part of a computer system serving the office of Robert Gates, defence secretary, but declined to say who it believed was behind the attack.

    Current and former officials have told the Financial Times an internal investigation has revealed that the incursion came from the People’s Liberation Army.

    One senior US official said the Pentagon had pinpointed the exact origins of the attack. Another person familiar with the event said there was a “very high level of confidence...trending towards total certainty” that the PLA was responsible. The defence ministry in Beijing declined to comment on Monday.

    Bush needs to be concerned with the Real Enemy: China, instead of starting wars with everyone else.

    By Blogger Larry, at 6:09 PM  

  • Most young people today have no memory of a time when Walter Reuther of the UAW and John L. Lewis of the United Mine Workers were household names, when presidents jawboned labor to prevent agreements from causing wage-price inflation, when productivity gains pushed wages up, and when more than a third of the American workforce was unionized.

    Now fewer than 8 percent of America's private sector workers are in unions, median wage gains have fallen far behind productivity gains, and for most of us Labor Day means a long weekend.

    What happened? Some say it started in the early 80s after Ronald Reagan fired the nation's air-traffic controllers for striking - something they had no legal right to do - and thereby legitimized a wave of corporate union busting. Others blame it on a more pervasive "greed is good" aggressiveness that engulfed corporate suites starting right about then.

    There's no question that, ever since, and with ever greater alacrity, companies have fired workers for trying to form unions, even though that's illegal, and have used or threatened to use permanent replacements if workers go on strike - which is legal but was rare before the 80s.

    By Blogger Larry, at 7:23 PM  

  • A Bloodthirsty Year For Bush:

    We keep reading and hearing how U.S. troops casualties are down since the surge. They are not down. If you compare them to last years numbers, they are WAY not down! Casualties in the summer traditionally go down because it’s so friggin hot. This year they didn’t. They are down from April, May and June of this year, but only because of the summer heat and they go down at this time anyway. Just to set the record straight………

    Janurary 2006 62
    January 2007 83

    February 2006 55
    February 2007 81

    March 2006 31
    March 2007 81

    April 2006 76
    April 2007 104

    May 2006 69
    May 2007 126

    June 2006 61
    June 2007 101

    July 2006 43
    July 2007 79

    August 2006 65
    August 2007 81

    Iraq Civilian Casualties

    Aug-06 2966 Aug-07 1674
    July-06 1280 Jul-07 1690
    Jun-06 870 Jun-07 1345
    May-06 1119 May-07 1980
    Apr-06 1009 Apr-07 1821
    March-06 1092 Mar-07 2977
    Feb-06 846 Feb-07 3014
    Jan-06 779 Jan-07 1802

    These Deaths Are Bush's reason to live!

    By Blogger Larry, at 7:25 PM  

  • Bush and Cheney are concerned with China, read this article to see how China fits into Cheneys plans for destabilizing the Middle East.

    What Will We Do Then?

    The Day After We Strike Iran

    By GARY LEUPP

    Let us suppose that the Bush-Cheney administration answers the neocons’ prayer and does indeed bomb Iran sometime soon. The plan apparently involves more than the destruction of nuclear facilities, replicating Israel’s attack on Iraq’s Osirak reactor in 1981. (That attack, by the way was condemned by the whole world, including a furious President Ronald Reagan). It includes an all-out assault on the Iranian political and religious leadership. Government buildings and officials’ residences will be targeted, guaranteeing collateral damage.
    Since Iran is a highly complex society, and its government widely unpopular, there may well be some local support for a “shock and awe” campaign. We know that the administration has cultivated ties with the Mujahadeen Khalq (even though they remain on the State Department’s terrorist list) and the Pakistan-based Balochi separatist group Jundallah (the Party of God). These among other organizations will get their marching orders amid the “creative chaos” produced by the attack. There can be no large deployment of U.S. troops in Iran, unless they evacuate from Afghanistan and Iraq which is unlikely.

    I doubt that administration plans for the construction of a post-attack Iranian polity are any more sophisticated than their plans for post-Taliban Afghanistan or occupied Iraq. Some have suggested that the neocons’ goal is actually to plunge the Muslim Middle East into prolonged pandemonium, insuring that all foes of Israel are off-balance and terrorized by the might of Israel’s protector for generations to come. “Neocons,” writes Paul Craig Roberts, “have convinced themselves that nuking Iran will show the Muslim world that Muslims have no alternative to submitting to the will of the US government.”

    They are “total Islamophobes” who believe that “Islam must be deracinated and the religion destroyed. . .” Others note that Cheney is obsessed with the imagined threat of a rising China and the need to establish permanent U.S. bases in Central and Southwest Asia to “contain” the world’s most populous nation. The desire to control the flow of oil, the urge to check China, the passionate drive to destroy Israel’s enemies (alongside this neocon Islamophobia) are all reflected in U.S. foreign policy since 9-11.

    Surely a lot of Iranians know this. And they can look over their northern border into Afghanistan and their western border into Iraq and see what disaster U.S. imperialism has wrought in these neighboring countries. Bush calls them “democracies” and boasts of having gifted them with the universally applicable model pioneered by America’s founding fathers. But I’d imagine Iranians paying attention see in Afghanistan a regime dominated by warlords more reactionary than their own mullahs, resisted by an equally reactionary resurgent Taliban. In Iraq they find an emerging regime under the strong influence of conservative Shiite Muslim clerics in an unusual alliance with U.S. occupation forces. Many young Iranians chafing under Islamic law might consider this a step backwards for Iraq, which under the despised Saddam had at least been a secular society. The Iraqi puppet government is of course far weaker than the one in Tehran, and humiliatingly dependent upon the invaders who cannot provide a modicum of security while they demand oil concessions.

    So I would think that the Iranian survivors of this planned criminal assault would not appreciate it. Rather they will resent it deeply, especially if it produces numerous civilian casualties. As Roberts suggests, the neocons believe that the Iranian people and Muslims around the world will be so terrified that they will capitulate to all U.S. demands and the U.S. will be better able to attain its geopolitical objectives without the use of unacceptable numbers of ground troops. I have to wonder about this.

    Perhaps the neocons suppose that there will be no resistance from a shocked and awed Iranian population as America’s Iranian allies---a mix of quasi-left guerrillas, terrorist separatists, monarchists and exiles---create a provisional government. They may underestimate the social base of the present Iranian government, the sincerity of popular opposition to U.S. policy in the world, the depth of Iranian nationalism and national pride at the accomplishments of the nuclear power program. They probably underestimate the outrage an attack will cause, in Iran and everywhere.

    Perhaps they overestimate the power of their weapons. The neocons know that nuclear weapons (even dire predictions about nuclear attack) produce fear---and that frightened people may voluntarily give up much of their freedom. They saw that happen here in the USA between 9-11 and the attack on Iraq. All that talk by Bush, Cheney and Rice about mushroom clouds over New York City got the masses scared, got them to support a war. The neocons may assume that this frightening thing they hold in their hand---that they can deliver (intoning with John McCain, “Bomb bomb bomb Iran”) as soon as Bush (after prayerful deliberation) gives his okay---can fix the Middle East. They may figure that a country once nuked will submit to any aftermath.

    Recall how they predicted in 2002 that Iraqis would respond to occupation the same way the Japanese did from 1945 to 1952. How wrong they were. Maybe the attack-planners think that the Iranians will, after this new, planned Hiroshima, unconditionally surrender to the United States. I doubt that. Just as they appear to have overestimated the power of U.S. troops on the battlefield in Iraq, Cheney and his neocons may miscalculate the power of their most vicious weapons to obtain their goals. Mao often referred to nuclear weapons (first those of the U.S. imperialists, then the Soviet ones as well) as “a paper tiger.” The imperialists might find that they’ve sent a paper tiger to arouse an Iranian griffin. (That’s a lion with an eagle’s head and wings, something not supposed to happen.)

    Meanwhile, reaction in Iraq to reports of a U.S. strike on Iran will hardly be positive. Iraqi Shiites (60% of the population) will naturally identify with victimized Shiite Iran and hate the occupiers more, without necessarily fearing them more. If you really want to do something that will fuel the Shiites’ historical sense of victimization, and unite Shiites from Lebanon to Oman and beyond, the best thing you could do is bomb Iran---not sparing the holy sites. But Iraq’s Sunnis won’t be happy either. Whatever their feelings about Iran, they’ll feel no joy in the expansion of U.S. operations in the Muslim world. The entire world will respond with revulsion. From Europe to Japan there will be much discussion about how to best distance oneself and protect oneself from a USA gone nuts.

    But what will happen here in the U.S. after the Iran attack? How will we react? If it happens, it won’t be announced the way the invasion of Iraq was. There will be more and more unattributed reports of Iranian arms deliveries to unlikely recipients like the Taliban or Sunni “insurgents” in Iraq. More alarmist reports on Iran’s nuclear progress. More propaganda about Iran’s intention to nuke Israel and produce a second Holocaust. More indignant statements about Iran’s defiance of UNSC resolutions. But the timing might come as a surprise.

    As the attack gets underway some Democratic leaders in Congress will indicate support for the move, based on the doctored intelligence reports they’ve read, or have had on their desk and possibly perused. Some will withhold comment or maybe even object to the action. I have the feeling both timidity and stupidity will initially prevail. There is little precedent for U.S. politicians condemning a U.S. attack on a country just after it’s occurred.

    I would expect those on the contact-lists of the various antiwar coalitions would be out on the streets in force immediately after the (first) attack, shouting “SHAME” and making it clear to the world that Bush doesn’t represent the American people. I’d expect that large numbers of people would gather to demand that the Congress move immediately to impeach Bush and Cheney. I’d hope that the Democrats in Congress would find it in their interest to do so, but if Nancy Pelosi becomes president, will there be any great change? On Iran, Pelosi has deferred to AIPAC.

    The antiwar movement has become disillusioned with the Democrats, and even with a mercilessly self-perpetuating system that uses its two parties to convey the illusion that the political status quo is the product of competition. Still, it sees no alternative to a mix of letter-writing, lobbying, voting, rallying, marching, exercising constitutional rights, operating within the paradigm. But Cindy Sheehan officially dropped out of the movement concluding that the “paradigm. . . is now, I am afraid, carved in immovable, unbendable and rigidly mendacious marble.”

    She is right. The neocons want us to “think outside the box.” Maybe we should one-up them and think outside the system. The “way our system works,” writes Andrew J. Bacevich, “negates democracy, rendering free speech little more than a means of recording dissent.” In it, “Money maintains the Republican/Democratic duopoly of trivialized politics.” What can the honest dissenter do when informed that the U.S. (“your”) government has committed a spectacular war crime? When can you do when you learn that, once again--- without your permission---the U.S. has attacked a sovereign country posing no real threat to you? Generating enormous hatred for America throughout the world? What do we do the day after? I would just like to pose the question for discussion as we approach that moment.

    By Blogger Mike, at 7:30 PM  

  • The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America summit in Canadareleased a plan that establishes U.N. law along with regulations by the World trade Organization and World Health Organization as supreme over U.S. law during a pandemic and sets the stage for militarizing the management of continental health emergencies.

    The “North American Plan for Avian & Pandemic Influenza” was finalized at the SPP summit last week in Montebello, Quebec.

    At the same time, the U.S. Northern Command, or NORTHCOM, has created a webpage dedicated to avian flu and has been running exercises in preparation for the possible use of U.S. military forces in a continental domestic emergency involving avian flu or pandemic influenza.

    With virtually no media attention, in 2005 President Bush shifted U.S. policy on avian flu and pandemic influenza, placing the country under international guidelines not specifically determined by domestic agencies.

    The policy shift was formalized Sept. 14, 2005, when Bush announced a new International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza to a High-Level Plenary Meeting of the U.N. General Assembly, in New York.

    The new International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza was designed to supersede an earlier November 2005 Homeland Security report that called for a U.S. national strategy that would be coordinated by the Departments of Homeland Security, Health and Agriculture.

    The 2005 plan, operative until Bush announced the International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza, directed the State Department to work with the WHO and U.N., but it does not mention that international health controls are to be considered controlling over relevant U.S. statutes or authorities.

    Under the International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza, Bush agreed the U.S. would work through the U.N. system influenza coordinator to develop a continental emergency response plan operating through authorities under the WTO, North American Free Trade Agreement and the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization.

    WND could find no evidence the Bush administration presented the Influenza Partnership plan to Congress for oversight or approval.

    Bush slipping this in with his North American Union.

    By Blogger Larry, at 7:33 PM  

  • China is the real threat, and Bush is too busy selling off our country to the Chinese, starting wars with Iraq and Iran to notice his own back door.

    By Blogger Larry, at 7:34 PM  

  • Forecasting the long-term direction of any market — stocks, bonds or housing — is a perilous endeavor. But it seems pretty clear that the housing market has not yet hit bottom.

    The recent slide in housing prices has been very moderate, but it’s only just begun — at least according to most widely watched data on both new and existing homes. As recently as the second quarter of this year, home prices were still up 3.2 percent from a year ago nationwide, according to Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight. And after years of double-digit gains in many markets, home prices nationwide are down less than 1 percent, according to the National Association of Realtors.

    But there’s evidence that prices are falling faster than the numbers indicate. Many builders are adding “free” improvements like fancier kitchens and bathrooms to avoid cutting their asking price. Sellers of existing homes are offering incentives — like paying the cost of repairs.

    If the slump continues, it’s going to be harder for sellers to get their original asking price. For one thing, the wave of foreclosures is forcing banks and other lenders to put hundreds of thousands of homes on the market priced for quick sale — usually at below-market prices. Those sales then become “comparables” — used by appraisers and future buyers to determine how much a similar house is worth. That puts further pressure on sellers to mark down the price.

    Another result of the Bush economy.

    By Blogger Larry, at 7:38 PM  

  • Larry, I think China is more an economic rival right now than a military one........the Neo Cons seem hellbent on making them a military rival as well though by infringing on and possibly jeprodizing their national interests....namely access to energy.

    By Blogger Mike, at 7:47 PM  

  • I'd like to throw this question out there for everyone to consider, hopefully i'll get some feedback...................How do you guys think an attack on Iran would impact the election, if we actually have an election.............i'm wondering if a nuclear attack on iran followed by $250 a barrel oil and $10-$15 a gallon gas would trigger the economic disaster and pain to decimate hawkish candidtes like Hillary Clinton and the repugs and shift things to Edwards, Richardson, or Obama.

    By Blogger Mike, at 7:51 PM  

  • Lydia, I have to say although I initially didnt support him Edwards has one me over and he's the guy I want right now.............I think Hillary and Biden are too old school corporatist democrats and we NEED new age progressives and Edwards has really one me over in the debates.

    By Blogger Mike, at 7:53 PM  

  • Mike:

    China is an economic rival and they own the bulk of the U.S, so that in itself gives them the edge.

    By Blogger Larry, at 7:57 PM  

  • Mike:

    I think an attack on Iran would only strengthen the resolve of the masses to get rid of Bush and his enablers and get someone who wants peace.

    By Blogger Larry, at 7:58 PM  

  • After Hurricane Katrina pummeled the Gulf Coast in late August 2005, tens of billions of dollars in federal and private contracts, the largest of which went to companies like Bechtel, Halliburton, and its then-subsidiary Kellogg, Brown, and Root, were dispatched to New Orleans. The alleged goal was to fund a clean-up effort President Bush said would require "a sustained federal commitment to our fellow citizens." That, of course, never came to pass.

    Thanks to its initial disastrous rescue effort, today, the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) receives most of the blame for chaos in New Orleans. But it wasn't just FEMA. The anatomy of the failed reconstruction is complicated, but understanding what went wrong requires examining the Department of Labor (DOL).

    The DOL has been in decline for a generation, suffering from long-term decreases in funding even as the number of people whose livelihoods it is supposed to protect has grown. Those problems have been exacerbated through the six and a half years of the Bush administration. But the consequences have never been more appalling than in New Orleans, where the failure of high-level DOL officials to require proactive oversight of reconstruction employers led to an endless string of abuses. After Katrina, employers, unfettered by rules, became less concerned with the task at hand than with profiting at the expense of workers without protection. They became predators in a lawless environment.

    In the two years since the disaster, there have been thousands of testimonials -- issued to both government officials and private advocates -- about a wide taxonomy of abuses.The most frequent complaint workers cite is withheld wages, but almost as numerous are accusations of employee intimidation, toxic and hazardous working conditions, immigrant abuse, trafficking, exploitation and monetary extortion.

    More Corporate Betrayal.

    By Blogger Larry, at 8:03 PM  

  • Larry said...
    Mike:

    I think an attack on Iran would only strengthen the resolve of the masses to get rid of Bush and his enablers and get someone who wants peace."

    I think your absolutely right, an attack on Iran would doom the war hawks in the election..........most reasonably intelligent people have to KNOW this.

    By Blogger Mike, at 8:17 PM  

  • Mike:

    Most predict Bush will attack Iran before the end of the year.

    By Blogger Larry, at 8:20 PM  

  • DES MOINES, Iowa — A year before they choose a new government for the post-Bush era, Americans are desperate to change the country's course.

    According to opinion polls and interviews with political experts and voters, the U.S. population is more liberal than at any time in a generation, hungering to end the Iraq war, turn inward and use the fed