Lydia Cornell

Thursday, February 22, 2007

NO HUMAN POWER

"Great men are they who see that spiritual is stronger than any material force; that thoughts rule the world." – Ralph Waldo Emerson

Today I was walking the dog behind Trader Joe’s and I passed a shady alcove bordering the alley, in the center of which was a large tree. I peeked into the bushes and saw a grocery bag. This seemed like a private place for a homeless person to rest, but just as I was thinking this, I glimpsed a pair of shoes attached to legs in camouflage pants, standing behind the tree, hiding inside the tree — as if they were hoping not to be seen, trying to blend in with the shrubs. I could hear the owner of this pair of legs trying desperately not to breathe. Was it a homeless person, or just someone who was trying to go to the bathroom in the bushes?

As I passed by, I said to the bush: “God Bless you.” I kept walking. Then I realized that I was holding in my hand two sticks of Mozarella string cheese, so I circled back to the bush and offered it to the person hiding. “Would you like a piece of cheese? It’s wrapped in plastic, it has its own wrapper," I said. A woman’s voice, shaking, rang out, “No, no thank you.” Then, the voice said: “You're very sweet.” I could see a pair of glasses and dark hair through the leaves.

I walked away and said, “You are sweet too.”

Then I started crying; I couldn't stop. It has been dawning on me more and more how truly tragic it is to be homeless — and especially to be a homeless child. Can you imagine what it’s like to have no place to rest, no privacy in going to the “bathroom”... no clean, safe, or soft place to lay one’s head. No place without bugs or flies, mosquitos or rats… no place to get dressed, to bathe, or to bring friends home for ice cream. No place to do homework. No place to have dinner or play Monopoly or take piano lessons. No dinner. Imagine being a woman going through the change of life, depression or cancer. God bless these poor lost souls.

Imagine if the human pageant were just a tapestry — and God sees the complete picture on the finished side — but from our vantage point beneath, we only see dangling threads that keep disappearing as they are woven in and out. As people pass on, certain threads disappear because they are part of a grand stitch that completes a beautiful landscape or picture on the other side. We can’t see the whole picture. We don't know the reason for death and suffering; we don't know what's on the other side, but I'm sure there are many mansions and colors -- and the weave creates a majestic tapestry.

I really want to be a virgin again in more ways than one. In this day and age, we’ve seen too much, done too much, been too naked. Mortal life is getting too extreme. There’s too much hard-core violence and porn in the airwaves. But we can become innocent again. There is nothing in the physical world left to want, do or imagine. I don’t want one more luxury gadget to make my life easier except maybe the new ipod phone. Actually nothing in the material world impresses me anymore. Except seeing, actually seeing God, which is love. Imagine if love were a tangible force. What would it look like?

I was thinking about the tragedy of the hurricane and the tsunami – and how many bodies have rotted and evaporated – how quickly human life is snuffed out. It proves to me what I’ve always known: that this mortal life is but a dream, and man is not made of matter. Rotting flesh has no essence in and of itself, no matter how real the illusion seems. Man is spiritual; we are linked to the Divine and to each other by the invisible fabric of love.

One of my favorite books is MANS SEARCH FOR MEANING by Viktor Frankl, who overcame concentration camp torture through the power of his mind. This is a universe of thought. Thought is energy and it is swift (too bad those lying 'Boat Veterans' forever ruined the word 'swift' for me, which just proves I am too much a victim of my thought.) Here's the Catch 22: what you think about all day long, is what you become; what you focus on grows. So if you're thinking about how bad the world is, or how much you lack, you will get more of the same. Or as I wrote in the comedy "Venus Conspiracy", "You can be attractive even if you're not good looking, because if you radiate love, you attract people." I know it's a silly line, but it is true. Beyond "The Secret" the best metaphysical writers who really now the truth are Mary Baker Eddy, Emmet Fox and Wayne Dyer.

Whatsoever things are good, pure, beautiful — if we think on these things we will bring these into our life in proportion to our thoughts. Our thoughts create our reality, and as Shakespeare said, "There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so."

I can't keep seeing George Bush as the antichrist, which is how I often thought of him. I have to see him as misguided, off track. He is a spiritually sick child of God. If I slip back into hating him as I have all year, I almost can't survive my anger; my view of him as evil actually perpetuates his evil in my mind, and nothing changes. Of course It's just so hard not to be horrified by this administration, the lies they told, the Machiavellian way they operate -- and the way they aligned themselves with truly good people in order to make liberals seem like heathens. To me the worst thing Bush did was proclaim himself a Christian without having an inkling of what the Great Peacemaker stood for. This is a travesty. I never mix religion with politics, but for Christ's sake, don't they know that Jesus was a Democrat -- I mean a bleeding heart liberal? (Sorry I couldn't resist; I know this offends people, but it's a comedy line I wrote in an Ann Coulter article.) Anyway, Liberal is not a dirty word: it's a great word. It means lover of freedom, equality and charity. Good conservatives are liberals at heart.

I have the profound sense that we can touch God everyday when we are loving to others, especially those who offend us and disturb us, and especially those less fortunate. Have you seen someone's face light up with just one kind word?

My sister went through open-heart surgery to replace a valve a few months after our brother’s death. Through the past few years, with the help of a pacemaker, she has gradually improved her heartbeat as she has became more spiritually attuned.

In December she started writing songs again. She wrote a song that was so beautiful, it had to come from the Source of love; it was pure inspiration. Her heart suddenly went into "sinus" or normal rhythm. The connection was clear.

When the troubles with her downstairs neighbor began to escalate, my sister developed debilitating pain in her feet, a form of arthritis. She could hardly walk. She was told not to hike anymore with her dog.

I believe her feet hurt because she was walking on eggshells. She was angry and hurt and unable to live freely in her own apartment because the downstairs neighbor kept harrrassing her about the noise upstairs with her dog.

The neighbor also harassed her because she was gay. This woman seemed completely malicious at times. What was more astounding was that she actually received mail from Trinity Broadcasting Network, the Christian evangelical station! We saw it in the mailbox. My sister tried to talk to her, but she refused. My sister tried to move, but couldn't find an apartment that took dogs and would double as a music studio.

She had to to work on this spiritually – seeing her neighbor through God’s eyes, as a child of love. She had to send love to her neighbor. This took a while, but she continued to return love for hate. Everytime the woman would rave and rant, or pound on the ceiling with a broom when my sister played music she was composing (in the daytime!) my sister would refrain from screaming back.

The situation turned around. My sister persisted in seeing the woman as a good person, and the woman became willing to talk. Now they actually wave to each other. This is nothing short of a miracle considering my sister was actually in fear of a hate crime at one point. She also thought her dog was going to be poisoned.

I was reading the list of Sundance films purchased for sale and was shocked to see that Adrienne Shelly, my favorite indie actress-turned-filmmaker, who directed "Waitress" had been murdered in November. She was murdered by a downstairs neighbor for complaining constantly about the noise he made. He finally marched upstairs and killed her. This was devastating, surreal.

I then thought of my sister and was grateful she had learned the spiritual lesson of getting along with her neighbor.

So what is the code? Is there a formula one can plug in here for all problems in life? Yes.

What I've discovered is that the solution to any material problem is never at the level of the problem. It is always above the problem or challenge. It is always by “letting go” and looking away from the problem, never by fighting it on its level. It is always a spiritual solution.

No human power could relieve my alcoholism. It was not healed by dissecting the brain.

No military power can solve this conflict in Iraq. We can’t fight fire with fire; we need to go above the problem and approach it from a diplomatic or spiritual solution.

This is what Bush doesn’t understand. Fighting ones enemies never resolves anything, as the Great Peacemaker said. One can never solve anything by force or fighting. More military might only escalates the conflict.

All great spiritual leaders know that you must "keep your friends close, but your enemies closer." And "a soft answer turns away wrath." Withdraw our energy from the situation and the situation will solve itself. We must withdraw and take care of our own side of the street.

Labels: , , , ,

931 Comments:

  • Great article Lydia and couldn't have read anything more profound, if it had came from the Power of Intention itself.

    By Blogger Larry, at 11:11 AM  

  • Thank you Larry.
    A nice surprise me, God!

    By Blogger Lydia Cornell, at 11:17 AM  

  • What Power your Sister has shown to turn things around. Very impressive. Patient Love. I'm fond of saying to People that Jesus was a Liberal.

    I'm glad I got here before the hundreds of other comments. Lil Joe and I joined with some friends down in DC to Bring the Troops Home. Report and Pics at my wee blog.

    Peace.

    By Blogger Human, at 11:24 AM  

  • Lydia said "I was thinking about the tragedy of the hurricane and the tsunami – and how many bodies have rotted and evaporated – how quickly human life is snuffed out. It proves to me what I’ve always known: that this mortal life is but a dream, and man is not made of matter. Rotting flesh has no essence in and of itself, no matter how real the illusion seems. Man is spiritual; we are linked to the Divine and to each other by the invisible fabric of love."


    Excellent article Lydia, there are several parts I plan to comment on throughout the day.

    But first you are absolutely right how short and how precious life can be, also the vast majority of both spiritual people and religions from prehistoric times to the present have had a belief that our physical bodies are distinct and seperate from our spiritual sides or souls, although in life our spiritual self resides in our physical body, The Ancient Egyptians believed this, they also believed that after death the two seperate with the physical death occuring first, with the spiritual energy moving on to another plane of existence in most cases.

    Like Worf says I dont pretend to have the answers, but this certainly seems a plausible scenario.

    By Blogger Mike, at 11:35 AM  

  • If you think about it, what Lydia's article is talking about is also what being a Liberal really is.

    Bringing peace by showing positive acts instead of all the hate.

    By Blogger Larry, at 11:39 AM  

  • Well written article Lydia. Concise, clear and to the point.

    I liked it.

    By Blogger UBER WORFEUS, at 11:43 AM  

  • Lydia said "My sister went through open-heart surgery to replace a valve a few months after our brother’s death. Through the past few years, with the help of a pacemaker, she has gradually improved her heartbeat as she has became more spiritually attuned.

    In December she started writing songs again. She wrote a song that was so beautiful, it had to come from the Source of love; it was pure inspiration. Her heart suddenly went into "sinus" or normal rhythm. The connection was clear.

    When the troubles with her downstairs neighbor began to escalate, my sister developed debilitating pain in her feet, a form of arthritis. She could hardly walk. She was told not to hike anymore with her dog.

    I believe her feet hurt because she was walking on eggshells. She was angry and hurt and unable to live freely in her own apartment because the downstairs neighbor kept harrrassing her about the noise upstairs with her dog."


    Both statements make sense, I have read numerous times that sickness or near death experiences can make us more spiritually attuned, and just before my motorcycle accident last summer I did experience an amazing spiritual phenomena that I feel was possibly god watching over me, instead of feeling it was a day of evil misfortune where I almost died, I prefer to see it as amazingly fortunate, Life is so precious and my life could have either been snuffed out right there or I could have been paralized or crippled for life, fortunately neither was the case.

    Also about your sister's feet hurting, I have read in several articles that stress and various negative emotions are tied to various ailments and specific localizations of pain, I remember reading that financial worries are correlated with lower back pain and from times in my life when I have had financial difficulties I have on occassion noticed this correlation, i'll see if i can find what type of stress correlates to pain in the feet if I can.

    By Blogger Mike, at 11:48 AM  

  • Larry said "If you think about it, what Lydia's article is talking about is also what being a Liberal really is.

    Bringing peace by showing positive acts instead of all the hate."

    I agree Larry, BTW excellent article on Kay's blog about Gates, it summarizes my feelings completely, I ininitially tried to give Gates the benefit of the doubt, but after his Nazi talk of calling those that oppose Bush's nonplan "EMBOLDENER"S og the enemy and his support of the surge he lost me for good, he;s just another repug shill trying to buy time for Bush and smear the democrats.

    By Blogger Mike, at 11:52 AM  

  • I was watching Meet The Press and the other various Sunday morning shows and after listening to the usual repug rhetoric like anyone who opposes Bush's plan should have a plan of their own, when the utter ridiculousness of this statement hit me.

    How is merely throwing more troops into the meat grinder of an Iraqi civil war any more a plan than withdrawing troops, its not, its a tactic is all it is it has no long term plan, no strategy and no reasoned correlation to the desired outcome its just more of the same, it fails to outline how that specific amount of additional troops will help address the unrest and civil war, fails to give a timeframe for success or failure, and fails to give a coherent plan for what should happen if conditions worsen or if the Irai's will view this as a hostile occupation and ramp up the violence.

    As usual there appears to be no plan just more of the same death and rhetoric, and instead of the Administration articulating a plan they merely smear there opponents as "emboldening" the enemy, when I think they lack the intelligence to even know who the enemy is, is it the Sunni's, the Shite's etc.......or is it just the unseen islamofascists Bush claims are always maniacally plotting to kill us 24/7?????????

    By Blogger Mike, at 11:53 AM  

  • Again to summarize the next time one of the repugs say we need a plan in order to oppose Bush;s plan to send more troops, I'd like to hear one of the talking heads say:

    Sending more troops is no more a "plan" that withdrawing troops, surely you can do better than that or Karl Rove's Nazi talk that we are "EMBOLDENING" the "enemy" by opposing Bush's plan. He may as well grow a set and just come out and say he opposes freedom of speech and feels it is treason to publicly disagree with the Dictator in Chief!

    By Blogger Mike, at 11:54 AM  

  • The army alone has 50 investigations of fraud over all the money flowing into Iraq.

    Do they expect us to believe that they will find anything on Haliburton?

    By Blogger Larry, at 11:57 AM  

  • One thing on "Meet The Press" I did find somewhat disturbing though was when, Russert asked Schumer why be voted to confirm General Petraeus when he opposes the surge and Schumer just shrugged him off and said thats on Bush or something to that effect.

    That leads me to believe that he and many like him may be approaching this politically instead of doing that which is right, they are taking the easy path that is best for themselves instead of the tougher path that is in our countries best interests.

    From his answer it sure looked like he just wants to sit Back and let Bush hang himself and watch the repug party self destruct whiles he says told ya. If the democrats dont support the surge then they should not have voted to confirm a general who put that forth as his plan.

    It seems to me Bush fires all the generals who oppose what he wants to happen and then he found a shill willing to be his puppet (Petraeus) and the dems oppose the strategy but confirm the guy, i'm still gonna give them the benefit of the doubt but that looks like them voting for the war all over again with a few non binding resolutions and rebukes in there to cover their ass's.

    By Blogger Mike, at 12:07 PM  

  • Petraeus has been on this mess from the beginning, only in a different capacity.

    Pushing more worthless idealogues off won't help the Democrats politically.

    They need to stop this disaster.

    By Blogger Larry, at 12:10 PM  

  • Lydia said "No military power can solve this conflict in Iraq. We can’t fight fire with fire; we need to go above the problem and approach it from a diplomatic or spiritual solution. "

    I agree completely that US military power can not resolve this conflict, and that we do need to approach it diplomatically/spiritually, however I would like to add that in order to do that we need to understand the problem andprovide a detailed and coherent strategy to achieve the desired outcome.

    Bush and the Neo Cons have clearly proven that either they have absolutely no understanding of the situation in Iraq or they are out to mislead the American people as to what that situation is or some combination of both.

    This war is NOT us fighting the evil terrorists, it is a civil war with Sunni and Shia militia's fighting for power with us in the middle and despised and hated by all.

    As for solutions Bush and his pack of Neo Con fools have offered none, no solutions, no plan, no goals, no method of assessing his or the OIrai's performance or competence, just more troops and bombs more of the same.

    Sending more troops is no more a plan than withdrawing troops and its about time one of the talking heads call this empty rhetoric what it is and point that out.

    By Blogger Mike, at 12:17 PM  

  • I agree Larry but the only way to do that is to impeach Bush and Cheney and that is going to be a long strategic process that likely wouldnt happen till 2008 during the election campaign cycle. and that is the repugs hope, they are hoping the Democrats will let it slide because they wont want an impeachment during the run up to the election because it will look vindictive and be a distraction to both passing good legislation to help our country and to those involved in the 2008 election.

    By Blogger Mike, at 12:21 PM  

  • CNN will have a report in 20 minutes about a battle in Najaf where "supposedly" 250 gunmen were killed.

    I wonder if that count is as accurate as the U.S military death toll that they claim is under 3200?

    By Blogger Larry, at 12:24 PM  

  • Two more U.S soldiers killed today in Iraq.

    By Blogger Larry, at 12:26 PM  

  • Hmmmm.... where have I seen that Emerson quote before? ;-)

    Lydia, this is really great writing, and you truly have illuminated my thoughts as well as yours. A couple of quotes come to mind:

    "Blessed are peace makers, for they shall be called the children of God." You know who said that. The second is from Homer's Iliad. It validates what you said about how we internalize that to which we expose ourselves. "We are the stories we tell ourselves." It is my favorite quote.

    Thank you! :-) My best wishes to your sister.

    By Blogger TomCat, at 12:27 PM  

  • PS - If you want to see the face of God, have you considered looking in the mirror?

    By Blogger TomCat, at 12:28 PM  

  • If not the face, then at least the Heart of God.

    By Blogger Larry, at 12:29 PM  

  • I just read the article again, and it is an excellent, well written article that I am in complete agreement with, however I just want to say in Bush's case I really dont think winning the war was ever an objective.

    I think his objectives were to use the war and fear of terrorism to seize power domestically just as Hitler did and to ensure American world dominance both militarily and economically by gaining a foothold in the Middle East by installing puppet governments in Iran and iraq that cowtow to American interests and to open up the oil development to American companies so they can makes billions and even trillions developing their oil and gas reserves.

    By Blogger Mike, at 1:02 PM  

  • Tomcat, I was reading your profile, and it seems you were quite familiar with Vietnam, would you compare this war more to Vietnam or to Hitlers agression in WW2.

    I was too young to really remember much about Vietnam but I feel that although it is a quagmire like Vietnam and although this war is somwhat coldwar like only now its us against muslims instead of communists, I think its more about seizing power and furthering American interests than Vietnam was.

    By Blogger Mike, at 1:05 PM  

  • Human, thank you. I checked out the great pictures on your blog. I wish the news would cover this extensively. I liked the nice couple you photographed, whom I definitely trust more than George and Laura.

    By Blogger Lydia Cornell, at 4:31 PM  

  • TomCat, you have no idea how much your words mean to me.

    Mike, you are an amazing spirit and what you went through with your accident seems to have deepened you.

    By Blogger Lydia Cornell, at 4:32 PM  

  • I'm going to claim a little credit for your piece with my comment to TomCat last night :-D

    But beautifully written, Lydia. A very powerful piece.

    The power of emotion, of intention, as you pointed out in the snowflake piece earlier this month, is undeniable: subtle, but undeniable.

    Hate and anger have their roots in fear. That which we fear, we hate, because fear brings us to places inside ourselves to confront those things we dare not look at closely.

    We assuage these fears with alcohol, with material things, and yes, often with religion. In moderation, none of these things is bad. In excess, they all are.

    We've stopped being human "beings". We define ourselves by what we have, or have not. We've allowed ourselves to be defined by the external: by friends, by relatives, by downstairs neighbors who hate us for what they perceive we are.

    Many years ago, after going thru enormous amounts of therapy, I gave up defining myself by others, and found a new well of emotion. I also found the ability to laugh at myself and to laugh at others for not being able to laugh at themselves (like MooMoo ;-) )

    I still have work to do (like you, Lydia, I *need* that iPhone!), but I take comfort in knowing I'm on my own road, and not following a pack who don't know a better way.

    By Blogger Carl, at 5:06 PM  

  • TomCat said...
    PS - If you want to see the face of God, have you considered looking in the mirror?


    I'm wayyyy to modest to admit that ;-)

    By Blogger Carl, at 5:07 PM  

  • By the way, Lydia?

    A good test of your philosophy is when your children stay out all night....

    By Blogger Carl, at 5:08 PM  

  • This post has been removed by the author.

    By Blogger Carl, at 5:08 PM  

  • Hi Mike. That's an interesting question. In Vietnam, the primary motivator for initial involvement was our desire to maintain solidarity with our ally, France. So we financed their war until 1954. Ho had originally tried to ally with the US, because of his relationship with the OSS during WWII, but when we abrogated our agreement with him to support an independent Vietnam, he turned to the Soviets and Red Chinese for support. When the French withdrew, the US was motivated by the fear of communism to install a dictator (Diem) and prevent the free elections promised in the Geneva Accords. At that time, the military industrial complex, about which Eisenhower warned us, was seeing Vietnam as a road to power (military) and profit (industrial).

    Congress was duped into supporting the war in Vietnam by false claims about the Gulf of Tonkin incident, like it was in Iraq over false claims about WMD and connections with Al Qaeda. In both Vietnam and Iraq and our leaders failed to recognize that guerrilla forces are almost impossible to crush if they have the support of the people. In both the US installed puppets (Diem and Chalabi) who were not competent to hold power and had less control over the regimes that replaced them. So there are many parallels there.

    However, Hitler wanted Germany to become the dominant world power and insure access to raw materials through military conquest, and he used the war as a cover for human rights abuses. This directly parallels Bush in Iraq. If you're not already familiar (which you probably are) check out the AEI's New American Century. Also, Iraq was intended to be a permanent occupation. Why else would Bush build an embassy complex the size of the Vatican City.

    So, I guess I don't have a cut and dried answer for you. There are elements of both. Bush's war embodies both the incompetence and public deception of Vietnam with the Machiavellian megalomania of Hitler's aggression.

    By Blogger TomCat, at 5:23 PM  

  • Gee, Lydia {blush}. I just call them like I see them. I love your blog, even if it does think it's a chat room. ;-)

    Carl, when I said that, I meant that good-hearted people who are open to spiritual things reflect God. Lydia is clearly one of those, as are most of the folks here.

    By Blogger TomCat, at 5:29 PM  

  • TomCat,

    This "chat room" has bonded an awful lot of people ;-)

    By Blogger Carl, at 5:41 PM  

  • Mike,

    TomCat refers to The Project For A New American Century, of course.

    Check out who signed off on this...

    By Blogger Carl, at 5:42 PM  

  • Larry said...
    If you think about it, what Lydia's article is talking about is also what being a Liberal really is.

    Bringing peace by showing positive acts instead of all the hate.


    Well, Jesus WAS a liberal...

    By Blogger Carl, at 6:01 PM  

  • I'm aware of that Carl, and i agree with his assessment as well.

    By Blogger Mike, at 6:06 PM  

  • Joe Lieberman told Fox News that he may vote Republican in 2008.

    Wasn't that what he has been doing the past 6 years?

    By Blogger Larry, at 6:58 PM  

  • Thats no surprise Larry, I thought you were going to say he was going to come out of the closet and admit he's a repug.

    interesting though that before specific candidates are even announced pr what each candidates positions are he would announce where his loyalties lie.

    He's a partisan incognito repug as far as i'm concerned.

    By Blogger Mike, at 7:06 PM  

  • Lieberman babbled on for a time about wanting a Democratically controlled Congress and Presidency.

    He then said he may vote Republican in 2008. So much for his earlier wishes.

    By Blogger Larry, at 7:09 PM  

  • Hey Worf, coming from you, that means a lot! LOL

    And I really appreciate it.

    Carl, you're right; it's an inside job...

    By Blogger Lydia Cornell, at 7:42 PM  

  • Words of wisdom, for sure. I believe in so much of what you've expressed. I feel what we learn in this life transcends onto the next. The fact that life is indeed short makes me wonder how so many can continue to take it for granted, and not show their love and appreciation for everything in their lives, especially people. Such as in my belief about life in and of itself: People first, money and possessions last. I live frugally by choice and savor much.

    Ah, yes. Bush. I also believe him to be the antichrist. The fact that he wraps himself up not only in our beloved American flag but in the bible completely disgusts me. He is no more a man of religion than I am a natural blonde.

    By Blogger Jacq, at 7:52 PM  

  • that cunt polosi and al sharpton should team up.

    By Blogger Junk Yard Willie, at 8:18 PM  

  • Greetings Lydia,

    I'm here via Human's blog.

    I couldn't agree with this post more, especially with the last paragraph.

    One of my favorite protest signs is "Who would Jesus kill?" He was, for those who know Him, the ultimate pacifist.

    While I couldn't make it to DC, we did our very best in Palm Springs, CA, to bring local attention to the national crisis.

    By Blogger msliberty, at 8:27 PM  

  • TomCat said: "Bush's war embodies both the incompetence and public deception of Vietnam with the Machiavellian megalomania of Hitler's aggression."

    Very well put!! And scary.

    Jacq and MsLiberty, thanks for visiting.

    By Blogger Lydia Cornell, at 8:39 PM  

  • Tomcat, you left ONE very important item out of your quick history of the run up to Vietnam War which is extremely important to understand why the US Presidents acted the way they did after Eisenhower left office. Right after the Fall of the french at Dien Bien Phu, the Dulles brothers inserted the US into the war against Ho Chi Minh. They had Edward Landsdale begin a CIA operation to destabilize the North in Hanoi, at the same time working to install Diem in the south in Saigon, and when they realized that Ho Chi Minh would get around 90% of the vote they first blocked the elections, and then formalized relations with South Vietnam by creating SEATO which bonded the US to the defense of the South Vietnam. So no matter who won the white house, the US was connected to the South Vietnamese Government by treaty.

    They did the same thing, in Tehran in 1953, with the coup by US and British lead by Kermit Roosevelt (CIA Chief)which placed the Shah on the thrown in Iran, and allied HIM to the US and the US to him for the next 25 years until the revolution of 1979. Carter was just following through on promises made in the Eisenhower Administration, exactly what Kennedy was trying to do, and Johnson screwed up so bad doing.

    This is exactly what Nixon did with the Saudis in 1972, he promised the US Government would protect a dictatorial Government in Rihyad in exchange for the Saudis only selling their oil in US dollars, which has tied Oil to the Dollar for the last 35 years and tied the US to the Middle east since then...at the same time he made Israel a major US ally in the region.

    The re-pubies TIE the US to dictators like Diem, the Shah or King Saud by treaty which no administration then can break without breaking the word of the US Government around the world. It is tricks like this which they use to get what they want NO matter who is in power. With their sneaky actions to bind the US to dictators and corrupt foreign leaders, they can lock the possible paths that Democrats like Kennedy or Carter, or who ever follows Bush can take.

    Bush is tying the US to the government in Iraq, by trying to get Maliki to remove his indigenous support and replacing it with the US, thus their attacks on al Sadr as a tool of Iran even though he opposes their involvement in Iraq just as much as he opposes the US's. Bush is just following the old repugnant foreign policy play book of setting up a puppet government which owes it's allegiance to Washington, not their local populace.

    However what the Neo-cons do not understand is the Iraqi's who we are trying to fool this time watched Reagan and Bush 43 play this same game with Saddam. They know how it is played and what eventually happens in the end. The Neo-cons can not get what they are after this time in Iraq, because the Iraqis have seen this movie too, and they do not like the roles they are assigned by the neo-cons and how it usually ends.

    By Blogger clif, at 8:43 PM  

  • Jacq people like Bush and Osama are fundamentaliats religious zealots, they use religion, patriotism and their power destructively for their own self serving agenda.............but I knew what you meant and agree with what you said essentially.

    By Blogger Mike, at 9:35 PM  

  • Mike: Precisely.

    By Blogger Jacq, at 9:43 PM  

  • I just saw that Chaz, my administrator must have accidentally logged into my account, because it sounds like him (he's a great guy):

    CHAZ SAID:

    Yes Lydia! Brilliant observations!

    The Bush bunch does not get it about living by the sword and dying by it. they think more troops is the answer because there answer to everything is bullying. thats there mentality. I said this before that America is like an abusive family. Bush Inc. is the ogre of a father. the democrats are the abused wife and we are all the traumatized children.

    HA HA i just had a funny thought about a spoof sitcom called the Bushy Bunch. like the Bradies except the cast of characters are all Bush people in all the rolls of the braidy bunch. Oh the comedy would be endless!
    Now who would play who?

    Chaz

    By Blogger Lydia Cornell, at 6:30 AM  

  • At first I thought it was one of the trolls hijacking my name. But it can't be because Chaz always speaks with wisdom.

    By Blogger Lydia Cornell, at 6:31 AM  

  • Carl, I don't doubt the bonding to which you referred for a second. I love this place. I just wish i had more time between work, volunteer work, and my own blog. And you were indeed correct to expand new American Century to PNAC.

    Thanks Lydia. Yes it is..... VERY Scary.

    Clif I fully agree that was important.

    By Blogger TomCat, at 6:45 AM  

  • CLIF - fascinating analysis of the truth beneath the lies, and the history of our Vietnam agenda.

    There are so many layers.

    By the way, Tomcat: you're right that everyone reflects God (or we all have the capacity to.) We just need get our striving, petty egos out of the way.

    By Blogger MAXMIXT, at 8:10 AM  

  • Since we have visitors today from Dubai, Bangkok, Perth, Kuala Lumpur, (Malaysia) Seol, Riyadh (Suadi Arabia) UK, Germany, Barcelona and Christ Church, New Zealand -- I'm opening Anonymous comments so it's easier for people to post comments.

    If this gets abusive we will put back the ban.

    By Blogger Lydia Cornell, at 8:31 AM  

  • Maxmixt, thank you.

    Clif, I never knew all this stuff. Why do we manipulate so much? What is our motivation? We are fear-based and think we have to control everyone to get stability.

    By Blogger Lydia Cornell, at 8:38 AM  

  • Well it looks like GWB told the truth about one thing he is much more of a uniter than a divider.

    In a few short years he has succeeded in uniting almost the entire world against us, he even united the Sunni's and Shites who have been warring bitter enemies for a millenium, the Sunni's and Shites worked together to shoot down a USA helicopter and kill Americans.

    No GWB is much more a uniter than a divider he has united almost the entire world as well as all decent freedom loving Americans who value life against him and his pack of Neo Con fools, the only thing he has divided has been the repug party, where decent repugs no longer support him or his pack of Neo Con fools.

    By Blogger Mike, at 8:46 AM  

  • Lydia Cornell said...
    Clif, I never knew all this stuff. Why do we manipulate so much? What is our motivation?


    Control = power = wealth, of a sort.

    It all comes down to a fear of loss.

    By Blogger Carl, at 8:50 AM  

  • US chopper down in Iraq battleFrom correspondents in Najaf
    January 29, 2007 06:04am
    Article from: ReutersFont size: + -

    US and Iraqi forces have killed 250 gunmen in a fierce battle involving US tanks and helicopters on the outskirts of the Shiite holy city of Najaf.

    The day-long battle was continuing after nightfall on Sunday, said Colonel Ali Nomas, as tens of thousands of pilgrims converged on the nearby city of Kerbala for the climax of the Ashura commemorations.

    A US helicopter was shot down in the fighting. The US military declined comment. A reporter for news agency Reuters saw a helicopter come down trailing smoke.

    Shiite political sources said the gunmen appeared to be both Sunni Arabs and Shiites loyal to a cleric called Ahmed Hassani.

    In Baghdad, 13 people were killed in bombings in mainly Shiite areas, police said.

    Twin car bombs targeting ethnic Kurds killed 16 people as night fell in the northern oil city of Kirkuk, whose population is a volatile mix of Kurds, Turkmen and Sunni and Shiite Arabs.

    Hundreds of thousands of pilgrims have converged on Iraq's other main Shiite holy city, Kerbala, for Ashura, marking the 7th century Battle of Kerbala, which helped consolidate the schism between Shiite and Sunni Islam.

    It is the first time the 10-day annual ritual has been held since violence erupted last February between Iraq's majority Shiites and once-dominant minority Sunnis. Tens of thousands have since been killed in tit-for-tat killings.

    The governor of Najaf province said Iraqi troops fought a day-long battle with up to 200 Sunni gunmen, including foreign fighters, holed up in orchards on the northern outskirts of the city, seat of Iraq's most powerful Shiite clerics.

    Governor Asaad Abu Gilel said the authorities had uncovered a plot to kill some of the clerics on Monday, to coincide with the climax of Ashura.

    "There is a conspiracy to kill the clergy on the 10th day of Muharram," Najaf governor Abu Gilel said, referring to the day of the Muslim calendar on Monday.

    A Reuters reporter about 1.5km from the fighting said he heard intense gunfire and saw US helicopters fire rockets at groves sheltering militants. He saw smoke trailing from one helicopter before it came down in the midst of the fighting.

    He was unable to see what had happened to the helicopter, but officers in Iraq's 8th Army Division and policemen said it had crashed and that the two crew members were dead. The US military said it did not comment on operations still taking place.

    Additional reporting by Aseel Kami and Sherko Raouf

    http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,21134056-401,00.html

    By Blogger Mike, at 8:51 AM  

  • As a society, we have been conditioned to think in terms of acquisition = self-esteem.

    This rates about fourth on the hierarchy of needs, according to Maslow. But it is the highest level of material need.

    Once you've transcended this need, you reach a level of intellectual need. You can, of course, backslide in many areas, even once you reach the ultimate set of needs which deal with personal holistic growth.

    The point is, to continue to strive upwards. Unfortunately, as with many things of this nature, it's pyramidal, meaning fewer and fewer people achieve that next level.

    The ultimate level, self-actualization, is to find one's calling in as many things as possible and to realize and achieve satisfaction spiritually, intellectually, and yes, materially (altho that does not necessarily mean monetarily).

    By Blogger Carl, at 8:57 AM  

  • Carl, did you hear Cheney's interview with Wolf blitzer last week, you could hear the tension, Cheney tried to threat and intimidate him as much as possible on the air, I wish I could have seen it, i'll bet if looks could kill Blitzer would have dropped dead.

    We've needed this for the last 5 years, its the Media's job to ask the tough questions and not play dead to authoritarian jackasses like Cheney and GWB.

    By Blogger Mike, at 8:58 AM  

  • You hit the nail on the head Carl, if you have read john Dean's book, he states that authoritarians like Cheney are not capable of empathy or thinking of the needs of others they focus only inward on their own selfish wants and desires.

    They are like spoiled 8 year olds, they are incapable of self growth or spirituality or moving to the next level as human beings.Their main focus that consumes them is their wants and desires and the domination of others including revenge on their perceived enemies.

    By Blogger Mike, at 9:04 AM  

  • This post has been removed by the author.

    By Blogger TalllTexan, at 9:21 AM  

  • It's important to 'keep hate alive'
    January 26, 2007


    Destroying a president is not much of a strategy to win a war, but it's all the Democrats have.
    The churls of the left don't seem to care whether their country wins the war, the important thing is to "keep hate alive." If hate worked in '06, maybe it will work again in '08, when the stakes will be considerably higher.
    Sometimes it's not only hate, but a bit of schadenfreude, too, taking pleasure in the woes of the enemy. "Partisan pleasure in George Bush's pain dates to the anguish of the contested 2000 election loss," observes Daniel Henninger in the Wall Street Journal. "The Democrats have run against something called 'Bush' for so long this sentiment is now bound up in any act or policy remotely attached to the president. Iraq's troubles, or Iran or North Korea, are merely an artifact of crushing this one guy."
    The president's tormentors in Congress, some old and some new, insist they don't have anything against the fine young Americans with their lives on the line in Iraq, but the troops are dispensable to the larger partisan goal of destroying George W. and abdicating the responsibility that comes with being the world's only superpower. If the troops are hurt, too, well, that's just a risk the critics will have to endure.
    Senators are leading the rush to judgment. Hillary Clinton, buoyed by the early polls that show her blowing Barack Obama out of the race, scoffs that the war she voted for is "a dead end." Susan Collins of Maine, a Republican, asks whether "the clock has already run out." The very point of her question is the smug assertion that of course it has. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska, who has all but given up his ambition to be John McCain when he grows up, says the obvious: "We have anarchy in Iraq. It's getting worse." You can hear the glee in his voice. John Warner of Virginia, eager to demonstrate that he's no son of the hard, determined men who wrote the book on standing firm against all odds as a fabled army of northern Virginia, rushes to join partisans across the aisle to forge a resolution of regret, retreat and ruin. "Nonbinding," of course. Senators never bind themselves to anything but their egos and personal interests (which is why we haven't elected a senator as president in nearly half a century).
    Sometimes a senator, oily and evasive as only senators can be, lets slip a remark that reveals all. David Gregory of NBC News provoked Chuck Schumer, the Democratic senator from New York, into such a revealing remark the other day. He reminded him of Vice President Cheney's description of the Senate resolution as something (a) the president wouldn't pay any attention to because (b) it would "be detrimental to the troops on the ground."
    The senator thought he was only begging to differ when he replied: "Absolutely not, and I think it's going to be shown, when this resolution comes up, and it is nonbinding, that not only are we going to get a vast majority of Democrats to vote for it in one form or another, but close to the a majority of the Republicans."
    The reporter pressed him to answer the question: "But how can the public really buy the Democrats' support of the troops but don't support the mission? How can you do both?"
    How, indeed. How do you tell the troops that "we resolve, to paraphrase John Kerry, you're probably not much better than war criminals, but hey, guys, we support you." Mr. Schumer squirmed, and his face reflected just for an instant the look of a man cornered. "Well," he finally replied, "that's the difficulty. A resolution that says we're against this escalation, that's easy. The next step will be how do you put further pressure on the administration but still support the troops who are there? And that's what we're trying to figure out."
    The fiercest critics of the commander in chief (the one the critics despise) and his troops (the ones the critics support) concede they don't have a clue about what the president should do in Iraq. "I can't tell you what the path to success is," says Norm Coleman, a Republican of Minnesota. Joe Biden, plagiarizing every other weak sister in town, says the "primary" strategy is to make the Iraqis "compromise" and "end the violence." Hillary says the president should "talk to bad people" to see what they want (the "bad people" have already said exactly what they want, loud and clear). John Edwards says he would get tough as president, and if talk doesn't work he'll talk some more.
    But of course. Isn't that what senators do?

    Pruden on Politics runs Tuesdays and Fridays.

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20070126-122638-2959r.htm

    By Blogger TalllTexan, at 9:26 AM  

  • Troll Tex just couldnt resist posting more Reich Wing garbage, here is a prime example of a pathetic Neo Con with no life.

    By Blogger Mike, at 9:58 AM  

  • Well TT, I'll have to admit, you guys are the experts on keeping "hate alive".


    You tell us who to hate and why we should hate them. You tell us what to believe, what to not believe and who we should want to kill.

    In fact, fear and hate, make up the single cohesive element of your entire party.

    By Blogger UBER WORFEUS, at 10:00 AM  

  • Lydia says she is for free speech. Let's see if she is true to her word. I've already crosposted this to Volt's blog.

    I notice, Mike, that you didn't respond substantively to my post, but chose, instead, to launch a personal attack. I guess your poverty of ideas is showing.

    By Blogger TalllTexan, at 10:02 AM  

  • Worf, why are you attaching Teutonic prefixes to your moniker?

    By Blogger TalllTexan, at 10:06 AM  

  • What Worf said pretty much sums up my feelings on you and your party Tt, that drivel you posted doesnt deserve it response.

    By Blogger Mike, at 10:08 AM  

  • TalllTexan said...
    Lydia says she is for free speech. Let's see if she is true to her word. I've already crosposted this to Volt's blog.

    I notice, Mike, that you didn't respond substantively to my post


    YOU didn't say anything. You just posted someone elses ideas with no commentary or thoughts of your own.

    When YOU say something, maybe someone will address it.

    By Blogger UBER WORFEUS, at 10:15 AM  

  • TalllTexan said...
    Worf, why are you attaching Teutonic prefixes to your moniker?


    Don't trouble yourself.

    By Blogger UBER WORFEUS, at 10:16 AM  

  • Hey worf, did you see or hear any of the Cheney interview with wolf blitzer last week?

    By Blogger Mike, at 10:20 AM  

  • Yea I saw it.

    Cheney said that everyone but him doesn't have the stomach for war.

    :|

    This from a guy who took 6 deferments to avoid going to war when his time came.

    By Blogger UBER WORFEUS, at 10:29 AM  

  • Clif, I'm curious, how many deferments did Gary Bush get?

    By Blogger TalllTexan, at 11:23 AM  

  • Clif, did you know that Jim Kerry got five deferments?

    By Blogger TalllTexan, at 11:27 AM  

  • I think its time to delete the troll, he's just being a slimy spammer with no point or argument.

    bye bye troll Tex!

    By Blogger Mike, at 11:31 AM  

  • " Mike said...
    I think its time to delete the troll, he's just being a slimy spammer with no point or argument.

    bye bye troll Tex!

    11:31 AM"

    So much for free speech. What a joke.

    By Blogger TalllTexan, at 11:34 AM  

  • If you're talking about the President, he chickened out of combat duty himself, and chose a cushy stateside post.

    Even then he was AWOL, and never completed his cushy stateside service.

    By Blogger UBER WORFEUS, at 11:35 AM  

  • No one has deleted you this morning TT. And no one will, unless you start trying to use this blog for a platform to publish neocon articles again.

    As long as YOU have something to say, we'll listen.

    By Blogger UBER WORFEUS, at 11:37 AM  

  • "UBER WORFEUS said...
    If you're talking about the President, he chickened out of combat duty himself, and chose a cushy stateside post.

    Even then he was AWOL, and never completed his cushy stateside service.

    11:35 AM"

    No proof of that whatsoever. If it were true, why did Dan Rather resign over it.

    By Blogger TalllTexan, at 11:39 AM  

  • TalllTexan said...
    Clif, did you know that Jim Kerry got five deferments


    JOHN Kerry served on a gunboat in combat, in VietNam.

    You seriously want to compare that to a crack addicted AWOL coward who hid stateside during the war, or another COWARD who got SIX deferrments and NEVER BOTHERED TO SERVE?

    Please do.

    By Blogger UBER WORFEUS, at 11:39 AM  

  • BTW Troll Tex, care to comment on exactly how you support the the veterans andtroops, and wanting to send more troops over to die in an Iraqi civil war isnt supporting them.

    I've heard you on countless occasions attack clif for posting here and say you dont want to support veterans or at least those that disagree with you politically, i've heard you have no problem with the poor pay in our military or the generals getting a huge raise to buy their silence or support while the regular soldiers get a tiny insignificant raise as a percentage of their pay.

    so you dont much support our military unless they are willing to die for you and you dont much support freedom of speech or privacy TT, what you do support is an incompetent pack of authoritarian Nazi like dictators, namely GWB and his pack of Neo Con fools.

    By Blogger Mike, at 11:39 AM  

  • TalllTexan said...

    No proof of that whatsoever. If it were true, why did Dan Rather resign over it.


    So you just lie?

    Thats all you got?

    There IS proof of it. He was ABSENT and DID NOT GET HIS WINGS because he NEVER SHOWED UP. That IS in his official record.

    Rather resigned over a document that may have been fabricated but the OFFICAL RECORD shows Bush did NOT show up several times as required, and was failed because of it.

    Either way, he still had his daddy pull strings so he could avoid the combat he now sends so many off to engage in for him.

    Hes a coward. So is Cheney.

    Kerry fought in Nam, and it just EATS YOU UP.

    By Blogger UBER WORFEUS, at 11:42 AM  

  • No worf this troll is taking his snide veiled pot shots at Clif like he always does when he has nothing of relevance to say.

    Free speech is one thing if you have an opinion or something of relevance to say, But the new rule was no personal attacks and this slimy troll is pushing things and testing.

    1) He attacked clif

    2) he had nothing meaningful to say, he was just talking stupid nonsensical gibberish like rusty and Johnny do.

    DELETE THE TROLL UNTIL HE HAS SOMETHING TO SAY.

    By Blogger Mike, at 11:44 AM  

  • "Mike said...
    BTW Troll Tex, care to comment on exactly how you support the the veterans andtroops, and wanting to send more troops over to die in an Iraqi civil war isnt supporting them.

    I've heard you on countless occasions attack clif for posting here and say you dont want to support veterans or at least those that disagree with you politically, i've heard you have no problem with the poor pay in our military or the generals getting a huge raise to buy their silence or support while the regular soldiers get a tiny insignificant raise as a percentage of their pay.

    so you dont much support our military unless they are willing to die for you and you dont much support freedom of speech or privacy TT, what you do support is an incompetent pack of authoritarian Nazi like dictators, namely GWB and his pack of Neo Con fools.

    11:39 AM"

    A) I do support the troops. I donated a substantial amount to the new rehab facility at FallenHeroesFund.org just this morning.

    B) I believe I agreed with Clif that our Vets should get more than they are getting, much more. I believe I said that right here in this blog.

    By Blogger TalllTexan, at 11:45 AM  

  • By the way genius.... just a tip for you.

    Kerry's not running for President.

    By Blogger UBER WORFEUS, at 11:45 AM  

  • Dont you have work to do Troll Tex, or is posting Reich Wing BS your job?

    By Blogger Mike, at 11:46 AM  

  • "UBER WORFEUS said...
    By the way genius.... just a tip for you.

    Kerry's not running for President.

    11:45 AM"

    Neither is Bush, genius.

    By Blogger TalllTexan, at 11:47 AM  

  • "Mike said...
    Dont you have work to do Troll Tex, or is posting Reich Wing BS your job?

    11:46 AM"

    With the hours I put in, there are quite a few ways to decompress and allow the mind to relax. Excercise is one. Music is another, and blogging is yet another.

    By